Published on April 3rd, 2006 | by Isaac Garcia1
The Good In Email (or Why Email Is Still The Most Adopted Collaboration Tool)
Email as an online collaboration tool sucks. Everyone knows this. Everyone says it. Everyone writes about it.
everyone agrees that its inefficient, it’s chaotic, its silo’ed and its
full of spam. Yet, in spite of these shortcomings, we can assume with
confidence that email is still the preferred method of ‘collaborating’
and sharing information with others.
Neither the declared “War
On Email (spam)” nor the endless-parade-of-collaboration-vendors has
seemed to of made a dent in the reduction of emails sent each day. A
recent statistic estimated between 32 and 62 billion emails are sent around the world EACH DAY.
So, why are Collaboration Software Vendors (Central Desktop
included), keen on vilifying email and so quick to promise a practical
alternative to the chaos of email? And, if the vendor’s software is so
much better than email, than why do users revert back to email as soon
as they hit a snag in the system? Why do users refuse to adopt
In short, why do we love our email?
Note: I realize that few companies today are touting their
collaboration services as a complete replacement for email. But my
point revolves around the idea that most users are looking for
alternate ways (other than email) to communicate and collaborate with
their fellow business colleagues and I believe that the industry has
perpetuated the myth that their collaboration software solution (plug
in your company or software name here (wikis, blogs, etc) as the
So, in our attempts to improve the customer
experience and increase Central Desktop adoption amongst our user base,
we’ve taken a closer look at email to see what we could learn from this
killer app that continues to haunt us. We’ve decided to look for the
Good In Email.
Below is a quick summation of what we believe is
Good about Email. The list tells us why users continue to collaborate
via email rather than adopting collaboration software and it also tells
us what we, as collaboration software vendors, can learn from it:
Email is Easy To Understand
everyone who has ever touched a computer understands email. Maybe it
was daunting at first, but in the end, email is easy to understand.
“It’s like sending a letter through the postal service, except its
electronic.” People get it. The fact that so many grandparents and
young children use email to stay in contact with their families and
friends around the world is a testament to its ease-of-use. Likewise,
after you “learn email” for the first time, all other ‘variations’ of
it are essentially the same. The learning curve for switching email
interfaces is virtually non-existent.
collaboration software solutions are difficult to understand. Many
provide such a different user experience (wikis for example) that the
learning curve becomes another hurdle of adoption.
In the words of Steve Krug, “Don’t Make Me Think.”
Email is Universal
of all knowledge workers use email. Understanding and using email has
become synonymous with ‘using the telephone.’ Email crosses the
boundaries of Language, Country, Creed, Geography and Origin. Everyone
has it. Everyone uses it. This is largely because email enjoys the
industry standard protocol of SMTP. The “SMTP Pipe” ensures that any
user in the world can participate and interact via email, no matter
what email client software they are running.
There isn’t a
collaboration software vendor that holds a substantive market share
today that is on par with email. Talk to three different companies and
they are all ‘collaborating’ on different platforms. Today, instead of
supporting an industry standard, collaboration software vendors each
attempt to lock their users into their proprietary platform and
interface. Everyone is using a different package and our industry lacks
a “standard pipe” to hook into. Michael Sampson wrote heavily on the topic of closed collaboration solutions late last year.
is providing us with some hope in this arena (and is beginning to show
promise), but in its current form, is still lacking interactivity. Not
to mention that RSS suffers from neglect because it is still virtually unknown to business users and severely lacking in general user awareness.
of sheer numbers, Microsoft’s Sharepoint is the clear leader in the
collaboration industry, but the number of businesses that actually use
Sharepoint is probably statistically unknown. Just because software is
bundled with something else, doesn’t mean people are using it, much
less understand it.)
Email is Accessible from Anywhere
You can read and access your email from anywhere without having to jump through rings of fire.
the corporations that restrict email accessible to the office or VPN,
ask yourself why every business user also has a Gmail, Yahoo Mail or
Hotmail account. The surge in Blackberry, Treo and other mobile devices
(primarily acting as email interfaces) speaks volumes to the point of
Collaboration Software is still difficult to
access. This is mostly for good reason as business users are, and
should be, concerned with security; but the accessibility of
collaboration software often falls prey to the IT department’s
insatiable appetite for restricting, controlling and limiting employee
access to mission critical tools. To date, even the most advanced
collaboration solutions only provide limited mobile device access and
Email Can Be Personalized
In spite of its crudeness, email is personalized.
provides the luxury of knowing who sent the message (activity alert) as
well as who else is participating in the activity. And, because of
email’s inherent features of carbon copying and blind carbon copying,
the message and alert system is relatively prioritized. The importance,
or weight, of the email message is often measured by the number of
people included in the carbon copy.
Its also just as easy for
the user to quickly include or exclude participants based on the
activity or task at hand. With email address quick-fill, alias mapping
and email groups, broadcasting activity alerts and messages becomes
Most collaboration software really starts to
breakdown at this point. The “easy-to-use” collaboration products
simply avoid personalization. Most enterprise collaboration tools
provide highly personalized features…..but who uses them? Its too
much work or costs too much money to be viable.
Email is Manageable/Configurable
addition to being personalized, email is manageable and configurable.
Both novice and intermediate level email users can create rules for
filing, routing and managing the data flow of email. Email has enjoyed
a renaissance recently thanks to products like Gmail, Sproutit’s Mailroom and Yahoo web mail; all which provide richer tools for managing and configuring email.
software vendors usually fall into one side of the ditch or the other
when it comes to providing a balance of simplicity or configurability.
Email has the unique qualities of being simple enough for beginners but
configurable enough to accommodate advanced users. This is something
every software vendor strives for, but rarely achieves. Fortunately for
email software vendors, the simplicity is inherent to the medium, not
Email is Searchable
resurrection of desktop search by Microsoft, Yahoo and Google (and
others) finally solved the common of ‘I never delete email’ syndrome
that plagues more email users than any of us care to admit. Gmail
clearly leads the pack in this feature; but lets not forget the little
company that Microsoft quietly acquired last year, LookOutSoft, which provided the simplest and fastest way to search your Outlook PST files.
Some early players like Enfish
were ahead of their time when it came to combining search with
collaboration. New collaboration software vendors are finally starting
to understand the tremendous power of search combined with
collaboration. Most collaboration software is about ‘fixing’ the broken
systems that business teams are struggling with to collaborate: such as
document management, file storage, revisioning, share weblinks and
bookmarks. The value of each of these systems is increased
exponentially when a powerful search component is layered on top them.
Search tools in Collaboration Environments MUST provide FULL document
text search for all popular file types such as Word, Excel, PPT, PDF
and HTML. Anything less is useless to the user and begs them to return
to searching their own email boxes for answers.
Email is In Your Face
the single biggest reason why users reject collaboration software and
revert back to email is that Email Is In Your Face. Like Instant
Messaging, email is highly disruptive, but it works.
into the previous points of Personalization and Manageability, each
user can determine the level of attention they want to allocate to
email and alerts. A user might check email every 30 minutes or every 60
seconds. The user can then determine how they want to be disrupted by
either displaying a systray alert or a pop-up window every time a new
email arrives (or if you are on a mobile device like a blackberry, you
can set it to vibrate, flash lights or sound an alert upon receipt of a
new message). In other words, email is “in your face,” “intrusive” yet,
highly personalized and configurable.
software vendors completely miss the mark on this point. Many vendors
send an email alert every time an activity occurs (thereby creating
more spam for the business team). This solution RARELY works because
the tool isn’t providing the users with the same level of
personalization and manageability that email provided them in first
place! Other vendors error on the side of caution by not providing any
email alert system or by not providing an RSS feed of activities (such
tools are doomed to fail from the beginning). While some provide RSS
feeds about group activities the feeds are usually of low value to the
business user. Low value meaning, lack of security (few vendors provide
SSL or Authenticated RSS Feeds), confusing or meaningless titles, no
user interaction with the feed, not personalized (receive all activity
information or none) and impossible for novices to understand or grasp.
Email Just Works
make this really simple. Email just works. It’s chaotic and
overwhelming, but it works most of the time and there is no learning
curve. A new employee can sit down at their new desk and they can
immediately start sending and receiving messages, participating in
email thread conversations, stay apprised of events and even delegate
tasks; all without having to learn, navigate or configure a new
interface. And, if that person wants to retrieve information from
previous projects or historical data all they really need to do is open
and search their Gmail or Yahoo account which they were probably
forwarding most of their email to anyways.
So where does this
leave us? This short examination of email reveals that there are a
number of hurdles that continue to plague the collaboration software
industry. In spite of its shortcomings, email continues to be the de
facto standard for team collaboration. Is there a need for advanced
collaboration tools in business teams? Yes. Will business teams
continue to rely on email as their primary means of communication? Yes.
Is there room on the business desktop for collaboration tools? Yes, but
the tools better be simple and they better be easy to use, and, they
better just as easy (or easier) to use than email. Central Desktop has
taken steps to address each of the points listed above (and will
continue to address them in the future), but I’ll reserve those details
for another post.
Am I suggesting that we all abandon our
collaboration dreams and submit to email? Absolutely not. As a fellow
collaboration software vendor, though, I think we’ve got our work cut
out ahead of us. Mass adoption isn’t around the corner. In order for
any of us to succeed beyond the outer rings of the blogosphere, we must
look closely at the single most successful medium to enter the business
world in 25 years. We must take a closer look at this killer app and
apply the same rules of simplicity and ease-of-use to our own products
if we ever expect to become more than a cottage industry. To succeed,
we must look back and learn and apply what we’ve come to understand as
the Good In Email.